Slaw has a post that has a quote from a just released Supreme Court of Canada case where the decision refers to blogging. The context is a libel case where the judge talks about the “astounding quantity and variety of commentaries on issues of public interest, ranging from political debate in the House of Commons, to newspaper editorials, to comedians’ satire, to a high school student’s blog.”
I’m going to write an article that comments on this and ties it into the Streisand effect, but for now: