David Canton is a business lawyer and trade-mark agent with a practice focusing on technology issues and technology companies.



Contact Me

June 26, 2006

Sony CDs can’t use ‘rootkits’

Tags: , , , , , , , — David Canton @ 7:12 am

David Canton – for the London Free Press – June 24, 2006

Read this on Canoe

Sony BMG has been under fire as a result of the manufacture and sale of CDs containing digital rights management (DRM) software. A lawsuit over that software was recently settled.

The DRM software at the centre of the controversy automatically installed itself as a “rootkit” on the computers of CD users when the CD was loaded into the computer.

There are two main areas of contention with the Sony DRM software. The presence of a rootkit can make a computer more vulnerable to third-party attack by things such as viruses and spyware. And DRM software can be used to collect information about computer use and transmit it back to Sony BMG.

Several lawsuits were filed in the U.S. against the record label as a result of the rootkit. Several New York cases were consolidated into one proceeding.

A settlement was tentatively reached last December but required the approval of a federal judge. That approval was recently granted. The agreement applies to anyone who bought, received or used CDs containing DRM software after August 1, 2003.

In the wake of the controversy, Sony BMG had already implemented a variety of steps to address concerns about the DRM technology.

The company stopped producing CDs containing the contentious software and removed CDs from store shelves. Sony BMG also issued a recall of millions of CDs and offered free MP3 downloads in exchange. Sony BMG claimed that the DRM software was never used to gather personal information.

Several of the terms of the settlement will require Sony BMG to continue to implement the plan that is already in action. For instance, Sony BMG has agreed to continue its stop on production of CDs containing the software at issue.

In addition, the settlement requires that the company continue to offer replacement CDs or free MP3 downloads.

The settlement also contemplates the release of new copy protection software by Sony BMG.

According to the terms of the agreement, the company must have any new software reviewed by an independent security expert before it can be released.

In addition, Sony BMG must disclose the existence of any copy protection software to CD users by including a short written description of the software on the CD.

Just as the settlement was receiving court approval in the U.S., Canadian class actions were being launched against the Canadian branch of Sony BMG. Actions have recently been initiated in Ontario and British Columbia, joining the action that was commenced in Quebec last November.

The new claims and the American settlement will likely bring more attention to this issue.

Canada’s privacy community, a vocal opponent of DRM technology, is also making an effort to cast more light on this concern.

A group of privacy advocates recently released a background paper outlining the dangers posed by DRM technologies to the privacy interests of Canadians.

The group asserts that DRM software can be used to circumvent privacy protections. The ability of DRM technology to collect detailed information about the computer use habits of individuals is cause for alarm, according to the group.

The paper and explanatory letter were sent to the Canadian heritage and status of women minister and the minister of industry in an attempt to draw attention to the threat posed by DRMs.

The purpose of the letter was to raise awareness regarding the issues surrounding DRMs and to make a plea for privacy to be a consideration throughout the copyright reform process. The letter and paper are available at www.intellectualprivacy.ca.

April 26, 2006

Today is World Intellectual Property Day

Tags: , , , — David Canton @ 8:32 am

As stated by the Director General of WIPO: World Intellectual Property Day is an occasion to reflect on how human creativity and innovation help provide a better world for everyone. Our message this year, Think, Imagine, Create, is directed particularly towards young people..

Its fitting then, that several major Canadian recording artists just announced that they have formed the Canadian Music Creators Coalition following the pullout of several Canadian labels from CRIA.

Note their 3 copyright reform principles:

1. Suing Our Fans is Destructive and Hypocritical

2. Digital Locks are Risky and Counterproductive

3. Cultural Policy Should Support Actual Canadian Artists

Can’t argue with that. See Michael Geist’s blog for more detailed info.

Look at WIPO’s web page for World Intellectual Property Day

Read Michael’s post on the CMCC

April 13, 2006

CRIA / music copyright never ceases to amaze

Tags: , , , — David Canton @ 10:38 am

Michael Geist has some posts about the latest CRIA / copyright law developments.

CRIA has called for an end to the private copy levy – even though it was CRIA that wanted it in the first place.

CRIA made a controversial CRTC submission recently that contained claims about file sharing that have been criticized as being inconsistent with the results of their own studies.

Now 6 Canadian members of CRIA have pulled out, saying that CRIA does not represent thier interests.

Add to that the news that the government does indeed plan to introduce a copyright reform bill.

Hopefully this will lead to some careful balanced thought as to the direction the reform should take.

For mre detail, take a look at Michael’s post linked below, and his 2 posts before that.

Read Michael’s post

November 21, 2005

Sony rootkit, lawyers, cows and algebra

Tags: , — David Canton @ 8:21 am

Yahoo! News ran an article last Friday that talks about the Sony rootkit. (This must be one of the most written about tech stories in a long time.)

The article quotes an analyst as saying:

The biggest mistake the labels are making is, they’re letting their lawyers make technical decisions. Lawyers don’t have any better understanding of technology than a cow does algebra

I’d like to think a few of us understand technology better than that. Of course it must be the lawyer’s fault – can’t have anything to do with propping up old business models, or ignoring customer wishes or market forces.

Read the Yahoo! News article

May 20, 2005

Canadian music downloading appeal decision

Tags: , , — David Canton @ 9:23 am

The Federal Court of appeal did not allow the appeal in this case. They refused to order the ISP’s to release the names of the alleged file sharers so they can be sued.

I doubt we have seen the end of this, however, as the refusal was based on the facts and the way the request was made – not as an absolute principle.

The court did not decide the issue of whether uploading was legal.

The decision itself, and other commentary is available on the CIPPIC web site.

Read the CIPPIC material
Read a CBC article

April 21, 2005

Music downloading appeal underway

Tags: , — David Canton @ 10:09 am

The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal hears arguments yesterday and today to determine if the Canadian music industry is able to obtain music uploader identities from ISP’s. Last year the Federal court said they could not.

Issues include privacy, and the fundamental issue of whether it is or is not legal for Canadians to upload music in light of Copyright Act provisions on private copying and media tariffs. In the wings are proposed copyright reforms that might make uploading illegal in any event.

Read a CNews article about the appeal
Look at the CanFlI site for more detailed info

« Newer Posts

Switch to our mobile site