<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eLegal Canton &#187; in the press. trade-marks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canton.elegal.ca/tag/in-the-press-trade-marks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canton.elegal.ca</link>
	<description>eLegal Canton: technology law blog by a Canadian information technology and intellectual property law lawyer and trade-mark agent dealing with issues including software, copyright, privacy, the Internet, electronic commerce, computers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:51:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Use it, prove it, or lose it the law on trade-marks</title>
		<link>http://canton.elegal.ca/2008/10/29/use-it-prove-it-or-lose-it-the-law-on-trade-marks/</link>
		<comments>http://canton.elegal.ca/2008/10/29/use-it-prove-it-or-lose-it-the-law-on-trade-marks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in the press. trade-marks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[for the London Free Press &#8211; October 27, 2008 Read this on Canoe Many businesses rely on the branding of their products to increase profitability and secure a place in highly competitive markets. A recent Federal Court, Trial Division, decision illustrates how important it is for a business to be able to prove it has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for the London Free Press &#8211; October 27, 2008</p>
<p><a href="http://technology.canoe.ca/Columnists/Canton/2008/10/27/7217696-sun.html" target="_blank">Read this on Canoe</a></p>
<p>Many businesses rely on the branding of their products to increase profitability and secure a place in highly competitive markets.</p>
<p>A recent Federal Court, Trial Division, decision illustrates how important it is for a business to be able to prove it has used its trade-marks properly.</p>
<p>In Grapha-Holding AG versus Illinois Tool Works Inc., the court allowed an appeal of a decision of the Registrar of Trade-marks, and held that the registrar did not have sufficient evidence to find that the trade-mark in question had been in use. As a result, the trade-mark registration was expunged.</p>
<p>Companies go to great lengths to ensure their trade-marks are properly registered. However, once the trade-mark has been obtained, many businesses fail to appreciate the importance of using trade-marks properly and keeping evidence of that use.</p>
<p>The Trade-marks Act is based on trade-mark rights arising from use of the trade-mark. Proper ongoing use of the trade-mark is crucial to protecting the trademark. Failure to use the trade-mark as defined at law may lead to all rights associated with the trade-mark being lost.</p>
<p>A trade-mark must be used consistently and without alteration from the way it has been registered. When dealing with wares, the trade-mark must be on the goods themselves or its packaging. For services, the trade-mark must be used when the services are being delivered or advertised.</p>
<p>If the trade-mark is called into question, one must be able to provide evidence to prove it has been used as required by the Trade-marks Act.</p>
<p>The act provides a mechanism for anyone to start a proceeding to require a trade-mark registrant to prove they used the trade-mark within the last three years. If the registrant can&#8217;t provide the required proof, the mark is expunged.</p>
<p>It also may be necessary to prove use if a business challenges another entity&#8217;s right to use a mark that the business feels is confusing with its mark, or if someone else registers a domain name that is similar to the mark.</p>
<p>To be able to provide the required proof, samples should be kept of use of the trade-mark over time, along with precise details of when and how the trade-mark has been used.</p>
<p>Also record volumes of the product sold annually, and details such as the number of brochures printed and distributed containing the marks.</p>
<p>The more precise this information is, the better, and the more third-party proof (such as an invoice showing the number of brochures printed), the better.</p>
<p>Though this information is easy to collect and retain along the way, many businesses don&#8217;t, as they don&#8217;t understand its importance. If one fails to keep adequate records, the consequences to one&#8217;s trade-mark and brand can be significant.</p>
<p>Businesses invest a lot of money in their brands and the goodwill and recognition that goes along with it.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s too much at stake to risk losing the rights to a trade-mark just because the owner failed to keep adequate records of its use.</p>
<p>The steps required to maintain the protection of a registered trademark may be simple, but the consequences of failing to take these steps can be devastating.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://canton.elegal.ca/2008/10/29/use-it-prove-it-or-lose-it-the-law-on-trade-marks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

