<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eLegal Canton &#187; class action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canton.elegal.ca/tag/class-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canton.elegal.ca</link>
	<description>eLegal Canton: technology law blog by a Canadian information technology and intellectual property law lawyer and trade-mark agent dealing with issues including software, copyright, privacy, the Internet, electronic commerce, computers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:48:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gift card judge censured</title>
		<link>http://canton.elegal.ca/2010/02/03/gift-card-judge-censured/</link>
		<comments>http://canton.elegal.ca/2010/02/03/gift-card-judge-censured/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=1732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the title of my Slaw post for today.  It reads: Last year a California class action suit resulted in a settlement where each class member received a $10 gift card from the defendant store.  The settlement called for the plaintiff’s lawyer to get $175,000 125,000. (sorry &#8211; typo) The judge who approved the settlement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the title of my <a href="http://www.slaw.ca/2010/02/03/gift-card-judge-censured/" target="_blank">Slaw post </a>for today.  It reads:</p>
<div id="TixyyLink">
<p>Last year a California class action suit resulted in a settlement where each class member received a $10 gift card from the defendant store.  The settlement called for the plaintiff’s lawyer to get $<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">175,000</span> <em>125,000. (sorry &#8211; typo)</em></p>
<p>The judge who approved the settlement didn’t like it, and ordered the lawyer to also take payment in $10 gift cards from the store.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/03/judge-censured-for-o.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+%28Boing+Boing%29" target="_blank">Boing Boing </a>refers to a post on the <a href="http://www.loweringthebar.net/2010/02/reprimand-for-judge-who-ordered-gift-card-payment.html" target="_blank">Lowering the Bar </a>blog that says that judge has been disciplined for that by the state Commission on Judicial Performance.</p>
<p>No word on the fate of the lawyer’s gift cards.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://canton.elegal.ca/2010/02/03/gift-card-judge-censured/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Class action against Great West Life begins</title>
		<link>http://canton.elegal.ca/2009/09/29/class-action-against-great-west-life-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://canton.elegal.ca/2009/09/29/class-action-against-great-west-life-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great West Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=1426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A London courtroom heard the start of opening arguments yesterday in a class action trial that is scheduled to last 10 weeks.  Colleagues of mine at Harrison Pensa are acting for the class &#8211; arguing that when GWL bought London Life in 1997, they improperly used policyholder money to finance the purchase. Potential damages are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A London courtroom heard the start of opening arguments yesterday in a class action trial that is scheduled to last 10 weeks.  Colleagues of mine at Harrison Pensa are acting for the class &#8211; arguing that when GWL bought London Life in 1997, they improperly used policyholder money to finance the purchase. Potential damages are hundreds of millions of dollars.</p>
<p>Coverage of yesterday&#8217;s proceedings is in the <a href="http://www.thestar.com/article/702391" target="_blank">Toronto Star </a>and the <a href="http://www.financialpost.com/news-sectors/story.html?id=2043440" target="_blank">Financial Post</a>.  Also see a Toronto Star <a href="http://thestar.com/article/702367" target="_blank">article </a>from a few days ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://canton.elegal.ca/2009/09/29/class-action-against-great-west-life-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

