David Canton is a business lawyer and trade-mark agent with a practice focusing on technology issues and technology companies.



Contact Me

June 30, 2006

Google – 1 step back – 2 steps forward

Tags: , , , , — David Canton @ 7:59 am

A French appeal court found Google liable for allowing others to use the Louis Vuitton trade-mark as an adword. That practice was controversial, and the subject of a few lawsuits. Google has been quoted as saying they don’t allow the practice any more. We should at least give Google credit for trying something controversial, then giving it up and moving on when it didn’t work.

Google’s new Google Checkout service is getting a lot of attention. It is a credit card payment service that online vendors can use to facilitate credit card payments from their customers. This could prove disruptive to those in the online payment business, and some online merchants. CNET and GigaOM have good articles that explain why the service is a good one, and why it is unique and disruptive.

Read a CNET post on the French court decision

Read CNET’s article on Google Checkout

Read GigaOM’s article on Google Checkout

June 29, 2006

Sympatico privacy / monitoring kerfuffle

Tags: , , — David Canton @ 7:57 am

Over the last couple of days there has been a lot of press – both tech and mainstream – about the amended Bell Sympatico user agreement. Language was added about the ability of Sympatico to monitor traffic and report it to the government.

Most commentary speculated that the language was in response to expected draft legislation that would increase the government’s ability to monitor web traffic. Bell denies that.

My first thought was that perhaps Bell made the amendment in order to generate publicity against the pending legislation. After all, ISP’s would rather not deal with it for both philosophical privacy reasons, and the additional costs and headaches it will cause. That would have been an interesting approach to lobby against it.

Even if that was not the intent, it may be the result.

I share David Fraser’s view that at the very least the choice of words was poor.

See David’s Canadian Privacy law blog for a post with more detail about the issue and links to various reports.

June 28, 2006

Ontario Privacy Commissioner releases annual report

Tags: , — David Canton @ 8:12 am

The Ontario Privacy Commissioner released her annual report yesterday on activities from 2005 and current concerns.

Issues include the need for governemtns to be more transparent about the details of contracts for goods and services, RFID, and document destruction.

Read the press release

Read the annual report

June 27, 2006

Video explains net neutrality

Tags: , , — David Canton @ 7:05 am

Digg has a link to last Friday’s Rocketboom vodcast that explains why net neutrality is such an important concept.

Its worth watching.

Watch the Rocketboom vodcast

Go to the Digg post

June 26, 2006

Sony CDs can’t use ‘rootkits’

Tags: , , , , , , , — David Canton @ 7:12 am

David Canton – for the London Free Press – June 24, 2006

Read this on Canoe

Sony BMG has been under fire as a result of the manufacture and sale of CDs containing digital rights management (DRM) software. A lawsuit over that software was recently settled.

The DRM software at the centre of the controversy automatically installed itself as a “rootkit” on the computers of CD users when the CD was loaded into the computer.

There are two main areas of contention with the Sony DRM software. The presence of a rootkit can make a computer more vulnerable to third-party attack by things such as viruses and spyware. And DRM software can be used to collect information about computer use and transmit it back to Sony BMG.

Several lawsuits were filed in the U.S. against the record label as a result of the rootkit. Several New York cases were consolidated into one proceeding.

A settlement was tentatively reached last December but required the approval of a federal judge. That approval was recently granted. The agreement applies to anyone who bought, received or used CDs containing DRM software after August 1, 2003.

In the wake of the controversy, Sony BMG had already implemented a variety of steps to address concerns about the DRM technology.

The company stopped producing CDs containing the contentious software and removed CDs from store shelves. Sony BMG also issued a recall of millions of CDs and offered free MP3 downloads in exchange. Sony BMG claimed that the DRM software was never used to gather personal information.

Several of the terms of the settlement will require Sony BMG to continue to implement the plan that is already in action. For instance, Sony BMG has agreed to continue its stop on production of CDs containing the software at issue.

In addition, the settlement requires that the company continue to offer replacement CDs or free MP3 downloads.

The settlement also contemplates the release of new copy protection software by Sony BMG.

According to the terms of the agreement, the company must have any new software reviewed by an independent security expert before it can be released.

In addition, Sony BMG must disclose the existence of any copy protection software to CD users by including a short written description of the software on the CD.

Just as the settlement was receiving court approval in the U.S., Canadian class actions were being launched against the Canadian branch of Sony BMG. Actions have recently been initiated in Ontario and British Columbia, joining the action that was commenced in Quebec last November.

The new claims and the American settlement will likely bring more attention to this issue.

Canada’s privacy community, a vocal opponent of DRM technology, is also making an effort to cast more light on this concern.

A group of privacy advocates recently released a background paper outlining the dangers posed by DRM technologies to the privacy interests of Canadians.

The group asserts that DRM software can be used to circumvent privacy protections. The ability of DRM technology to collect detailed information about the computer use habits of individuals is cause for alarm, according to the group.

The paper and explanatory letter were sent to the Canadian heritage and status of women minister and the minister of industry in an attempt to draw attention to the threat posed by DRMs.

The purpose of the letter was to raise awareness regarding the issues surrounding DRMs and to make a plea for privacy to be a consideration throughout the copyright reform process. The letter and paper are available at www.intellectualprivacy.ca.

June 23, 2006

Lessig on Net Neutrality

Tags: , — David Canton @ 8:00 am

Real Lawyers have blogs points to a post by Lawrence Lessig that sums up the net neutrality debate nicely by pointing out that: One clue to this Net Neutrality debate is to watch what kind of souls are on each side of the debate. The pro-NN contingent is filled with the people who actually built the Net — from Vint Cerf to Google to eBay — and those who profit from the competition enabled by the Net — e.g., Microsoft. The anti-NN contingent is filled with the entities that either never got the Net, or fought like hell to control it — telecom, and cable companies.

Both site refer to a Tim Berners-Lee (credited as the inventor of the Internet) post advocating net neutrality

As I have said before, I believe that net neutrality is crucial.

Read the Lessig post

Read the Real Lawyers post

Read the Tim Berners-Lee post

June 22, 2006

For the Privacy Obsessed…

Tags: — David Canton @ 1:04 pm

Gizmodo has a post that has photos of a scarf that creates a tunnel so not one can see what is on your computer or pda screen.

Amusing photos – but as Gizmodo says, “dorky- looking”

Read the Gizmodo post

Defective by Design anti DRM protest

Tags: , , — David Canton @ 8:21 am

Boing Boing has a post linking to the Defective By Design anti-DRM site where they declare Friday June 23 as a day of action against DRM. They will publish the phone numbers of RIAA (and similar organizations) executives, and encourage people to call them to tell them what they think of DRM.

Boing Boing itself has published several US senator phone numbers to call to protest the Broadcast flag. Seems that silly provision has been snuck back into a telecom reform bill.

For more on the DRM and broadcast flag issues, do a search on my blog. And yes, I know thats a pain – I’ll add a proper tag cloud to my site as soon as version 3.3 of Movable Type comes out – which should be soon.

Read the Boing Boing DRM protest post

Go to the Defective By Design post

Read the Boing Boing broadcast flag protest post

June 21, 2006

International Trade-mark Association comment on Whois

Tags: , , , — David Canton @ 7:57 am

The latest Webnames.ca domain news newsletter refers to a letter sent by the INTA to Vint Cerf of ICANN.

There is a trend to eliminate the viewing of, or reduce the use of, Whois data (the identity and contact info of domain name registrants). While I am sensitive to privacy issues about individual registrants, it is important that Whois information be available.

The letter should be read in its entirety, but it says in part:

… we respectfully request that it resolve to preserve access to registrant contact data in Whois and to improve the accuracy of that data so that violations of law and threats to the health and safety of the public may be addressed in an efficient manner.

Whois serves a vital role in remedying fraud on the Internet. Its uses include: law enforcement, consumer protection, and the protection of intellectual property rights. Trademark owners value Whois data in order to resolve domain name disputes (e.g., cybersquatting) and learn the contact details for owners of websites offering dangerous counterfeit products. Only with access to accurate and up-to-date Whois data can the Internet be a safe environment that can be relied on with confidence.

Whois not only facilitates the investigation of legal violations on the Internet, but serves a basic function in making the rule of law apply to the Internet by providing information necessary to serve notice and institute legal action against violators.

Read the INTA letter

Go to webnames.ca

June 20, 2006

Guest Blogger on ITManagers blog

I have been asked to contribute an occasional post to the Canadian IT Manager blog. It is run by Microsoft, and includes content by independent professionals.

My first post yesterday was 1 of 2 parts on Legal Matters IT Managers Need to Be Aware Of - the 2nd part will be posted today.

Read part 1 of Legal Matters IT Managers Need to Be Aware Of

Read Part 2

Go to the main page of the IT Manager blog

Read the entry announcing my presence as a guest blogger (among other things)

Older Posts »

Switch to our mobile site